U.S Bank National Association v. Somo et al
| U.S Bank National Association |
| Does 1-10 and Salem Somo |
| 3:2019cv02248 |
| November 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Michael S Berg |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER of Remand to State Court [Doc. No. #1 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 11/26/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(order forwarded to state court)(anh)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg on 11/26/2019.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Salem Somo. No Parties With Financial Interest. (jxv) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Salem Somo. (jxv) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Diego County- San Diego Superior Court, case number 37-02018-00051776-CL-UD-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CAS117169.), filed by Salem Somo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A&B, #3 Supplement Receipt)The new case number is 3:19-cv-02248-CAB-MSB. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(jxv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
