The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Gray et al
| The Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| Jocelyn Pearson, S.T.P., Christopher Gray and C.A.G. |
| 3:2019cv02278 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jxv) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Prudential Insurance Company of America identifying Corporate Parent Prudential Financial Inc. for The Prudential Insurance Company of America.. (jxv) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Identifying Corporate Parent Prudential Financial Inc. for The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (jxv) Modified on 11/27/2019 (jxv). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C.A.G., Christopher Gray, Jocelyn Pearson, S.T.P. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13212331.), filed by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-C)The new case number is 3:19-cv-02278-W-BLM. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Walker, John)(jxv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
