Hydro Net LLC. v. Franklin Wireless Corp.
| Hydro Net LLC. |
| Franklin Wireless Corp. |
| 3:2019cv02279 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Franklin Wireless Corp. . No Parties With Financial Interest. (Lobbin, Stephen) (anh). |
Filing 10
ORDER RE Renewed Motion for Extension of Time for Response to Complaint [Doc. No. #9 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/23/2020. (anh)
|
| Filing 9 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, #8 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer by Franklin Wireless Corp.. (Lobbin, Stephen) (anh). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Denying Motion for Extension of Time for Response to Complaint. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 1/22/2020. (anh)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #6 Summons Returned Executed, #1 Complaint, by Franklin Wireless Corp.. (Lobbin, Stephen)Attorney Stephen M. Lobbin added to party Franklin Wireless Corp.(pty:dft) (anh). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hydro Net LLC.. Franklin Wireless Corp. served. (Anderson, Kirk) (anh). |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia has declined assignment pursuant to General Order 598. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo for all further proceedings. The new case number is 19cv2279 CAB (KSC).(no document attached) (jcj) |
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *7,187,706* cc:USPTO (jxv) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jxv) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hydro Net LLC.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (jxv) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Franklin Wireless Corp. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13212805.), filed by Hydro Net LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - U.S. Patent No. 7,187,706, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Exemplary Claim Chart)The new case number is 3:19-cv-2279-AJB-KSC. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Anderson, Kirk)(jxv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hydro Net LLC. v. Franklin Wireless Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Franklin Wireless Corp. | |
| Represented By: | Stephen M. Lobbin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hydro Net LLC. | |
| Represented By: | Kirk Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
