Rosales v. County of San Diego et al
| Dolores Rosales |
| Deputy Terence York, Deputy Carl Fielstra, Deputy Eric Contrell Jr., Deputy Scott Rosall, County of San Diego, Deputy Steven Fealy, Deputy Brian Schaefer, Deputy Brandon Delima, Deputy Christopher Perez, DOES 1 through 50, Sergeant Dwain Washington, Deputy Evan McCormick, Deputy Ronald Bushnell, Deputy Nicholas Adams, Sheriff William D. Gore and Deputy Eric Cotrell Jr. |
| 3:2019cv02303 |
| December 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Linda Lopez |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 d |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION for Security of Costs filed by County of San Diego, Sheriff William D. Gore. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Aceves, Sylvia) (jpp).
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER vacating hearing on #8 Motion for security of costs and taking matter under submission without oral argument. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 1/29/2020.(jpp)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION for Security of Costs filed by Dolores Rosales. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit No. 1 ( Plaintiff's Property - loan documents), #2 Exhibit No. 2 (Plaintiff's Declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a) ), #3 Proof of Service By Electronic Method)(Arias, Jesus) (jpp).
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Security of Costs by County of San Diego, Sheriff William D. Gore. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration, #3 Proof of Service)(Aceves, Sylvia)Attorney Sylvia Soliman Aceves added to party County of San Diego(pty:dft), Attorney Sylvia Soliman Aceves added to party Sheriff William D. Gore(pty:dft) (mme).
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dolores Rosales. Sheriff William D. Gore served. (Arias, Jesus) (ag).
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dolores Rosales. County of San Diego served. (Arias, Jesus) (ag).
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Lodgment, by Dolores Rosales re USB video file, Exhibit No. 1 to the initial Complaint #1 . (jpp)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's motion for leave to file Exhibit No. 1 to the initial complaint non-electronically. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 12/04/2019.(jpp)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Lodgment by Dolores Rosales re #1 Complaint,, Plaintiff's request for leave of Court to Authorize the Lodgement of EXHIBIT No. 1 of her complaint, to be submitted in VIDEO Format Per Southern District Electronic Filing Procedures and manual (Arias, Jesus) (jpp).
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sxa)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against County of San Diego, Sheriff William D. Gore, Deputy Nicholas Adams, Deputy Ronald Bushnell, Deputy Eric Cotrell Jr., Deputy Brandon Delima, Deputy Steven Fealy, Deputy Carl Fielstra, Deputy Evan McCormick, Deputy Christopher Perez, Deputy Scott Rosall, Deputy Brian Schaefer, Sergeant Dwain Washington, Deputy Terence York, DOES 1 through 50. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13225829.), filed by Dolores Rosales. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)The new case number is 3:19-cv-02303-JLS-LL. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case. (Arias, Jesus)(sxa)(jrd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
