Mabry v. McVay et al
Kevin Deshan Mabry |
Purdy, L. Newton, John Doe #1, McVay, Coy, J. Flores, C. Ellis, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3 |
3:2019cv02361 |
December 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
Mitchell D Dembin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case number in other court is :20-cv-00394 (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mme) |
Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Western Division*.*255 E. Temple Street, 2**Los Angeles, CA 90012* (Attachments: #1 Order of Transfer) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kevin Deshan Mabry. (jms) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Coy, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, C. Ellis, J. Flores, McVay, L. Newton, Purdy, filed by Kevin Deshan Mabry. ($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-2361-CAB-MDD. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.