Bourque v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Dennis Bourque |
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
3:2019cv02371 |
December 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Karen S Crawford |
William Q Hayes |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE AND ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Rule 26 Compliance; and Case Management Conference. An Early Neutral Evaluation is set for 3/12/2020 at 2:00 PM in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. In the event the case does not settle at the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, the Court will immediately proceed with the Case Management Conference. A Joint Discovery Plan is due by 3/5/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford on 2/4/2020.(ag) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.(Rhodes, Dennis) (ag). |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company ("Reliance Standard") is granted an extension of thirty (30) days to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Reliance Standard shall file its response no later than 2/3/2020. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 1/15/2020. (ag) |
Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to initial complaint (L.R. 12.1) by Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION OF THE PARTIES TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT)(Rhodes, Dennis)Attorney Dennis J Rhodes added to party Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company(pty:dft) (ag). |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dennis Bourque. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company served. (Kantor, Glenn) (jdt). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties by Dennis Bourque (Kantor, Glenn) (ag). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13254519.), filed by Dennis Bourque. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-2371-WQH-KSC. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Kantor, Glenn)(smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bourque v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Dennis J Rhodes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dennis Bourque | |
Represented By: | Glenn R. Kantor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.