Rogers v. Spencer
| Ashley Rogers |
| Richard V. Spencer |
| 3:2019cv02391 |
| December 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Allison H Goddard |
| Jeffrey T Miller |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 ad |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Richard V. Spencer, filed by Ashley Rogers. (Vallero, Pamela) (sjt).
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ashley Rogers. Richard V. Spencer served. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service of summons, #2 Notice of withdrawal of doc. 6)(Vallero, Pamela) (QC Mailer sent re: Withdrawal of Document to be filed as separate document)(sjt).
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela Vallero on behalf of Ashley Rogers (Attachments: #1 Notice of withdrawal of document)(Vallero, Pamela) (QC mailer sent re: multi-pleading as one filing) (sjt).
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ashley Rogers re #1 Complaint, #2 Summons Issued (Gruenberg, Joshua)(QC mailer sent re: wrong event used, atty instructed to withdraw and refile)(sjt).
|
|
Filing 5
**DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN PER #7 ** NOTICE of Appearance signed by Pamela Vallero on behalf of Ashley Rogers (Vallero, Pamela) (QC mailer sent re: document not in pleading format. Atty instructed to withdraw and refile)(sjt). Modified to withdraw on 1/8/2020 (sjt).
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela Vallero on behalf of Ashley Rogers (Vallero, Pamela)Attorney Pamela Vallero added to party Ashley Rogers(pty:pla) (QC mailer sent re: document not signed, improper format) (sjt).
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Jeffrey T. Miller for all further proceedings. The new case number is 19cv2391-JM-AHG.(no document attached) (mme)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Richard V. Spencer ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13263248.), filed by Ashley Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-2391-BEN-AHG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Gruenberg, Joshua)(smd) (sjt).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rogers v. Spencer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Richard V. Spencer | |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ashley Rogers | |
| Represented By: | Joshua D Gruenberg |
| Represented By: | Pamela Vallero |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
