C.K. v. United States of America et al
| C.K. |
| DOES 1 through 50 and United States of America |
| 3:2019cv02492 |
| December 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| Nita L Stormes |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2672 pi |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Bibianne Uychinco Fell (Fell, Bibianne) (jrm). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by C.K.. United States of America served. (Fell, Bibianne) (mme). |
Filing 3
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks for all further proceedings. The new case number is 3:19-cv-02492-AJB-RBB(jrm)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sxa)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against United States of America, DOES 1 through 50 (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13316193.), filed by C.K. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-02492-AJB-NLS. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case. (Fell, Bibianne)(sxa)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
