Emrit v. Horus Music Video Distribution et al
| Ronald Satish Emrit |
| TIDAL, Horus Media Limited, Horus Music Video Distribution and PayPal |
| 3:2020cv00060 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mme) |
Filing 3
ORDER (1) Granting #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and (2) Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice for Failing to State a Claim upon Which Relief Can Be Granted Purusant to 28. U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 2/3/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mme)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit. (smd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Horus Media Limited, Horus Music Video Distribution, PayPal, TIDAL, IFP Filed, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-60-DMS-MSB. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Emrit, Ronald)(smd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
