Emrit v. National Football League et al
Ronald Satish Emrit |
Washington Redskins, Daniel Snyder and National Football League |
3:2020cv00062 |
January 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cynthia Bashant |
Linda Lopez |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Court: GRANTS Plaintiff' Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2); DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this civil action; CERTIFIES that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and therefore would not be taken in good faith; DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to close the file.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; and Dismissing Action With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 2/10/20. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(dlg) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark(s) cc:USPTO (smd) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit. (smd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against National Football League, Daniel Snyder, Washington Redskins, IFP Filed, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-62-BAS-LL. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case. (Emrit, Ronald)(smd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.