Jabbar v. County of San Diego et al
Plaintiff: Wali David Jabbar
Defendant: William D. Gore, County of San Diego and Captain Buchanan
Case Number: 3:2020cv00065
Filed: January 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Houston
Referring Judge: Nita L Stormes
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Denying #3 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED and the action is again DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prepay the $400 filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). Plaintiff is GRANTED one additional opportunity to correct his IFP deficiencies and an additional thirty (30) days leave from the date of this Order in which to re-open his case by either: (a) paying the entire $400 statutory and administrative filing fee, or (b) filing a renewed Motion to Proceed IFP. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 3/6/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Plaintiff mailed IFP form.)(tcf)
January 21, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Wali David Jabbar. (tcf)
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER DISMISSING Civil Action without Prejudice for Failing to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) and/or Failing to Move to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). The Court grants Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 1/16/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tcf)
January 8, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against County of San Diego, William D. Gore, Buchanan, filed by Wali David Jabbar. ($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-65-JAH-NLS. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jabbar v. County of San Diego et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wali David Jabbar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William D. Gore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of San Diego
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Captain Buchanan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?