Bassett v. Malveda
Plaintiff: Richard D. Bassett
Defendant: I. Malveda
Case Number: 3:2020cv00160
Filed: January 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Referring Judge: Andrew G Schopler
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER (1) Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ); and (2) Sua Sponte Dismissing Complaint Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) AND 1915A(b)(1) [ECF No. #1 ]. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures the deficiencies of pleading noted. Plaintiff shall have forty-five (45) days leave from the date of this Order in which to file an Amended Complaint which cures the deficiencies of pleading noted. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 3/13/20. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR and mailed) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo) (dlg).
January 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Cynthia Bashant Accepting re #1 Complaint,, from Plaintiff Richard D. Bassett. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 1/24/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jms)
January 24, 2020 Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Richard D. Bassett. (jms)
January 23, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Richard D. Bassett. (jms)
January 23, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against I. Malveda, filed by Richard D. Bassett.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 CDCR Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-160-BAS-AGS. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bassett v. Malveda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard D. Bassett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: I. Malveda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?