Garvin v. Payless Car Rental, Inc. et al
| Jeffrey Garvin |
| Dollar Rent A Car, Inc., Advantage Opco, LLC, Fox Rent A Car, Inc., Does 1-100 and Payless Car Rental, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00172 |
| January 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| William V Gallo |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 dtp |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John Clay Washington on behalf of Jeffrey Garvin (Washington, John)Attorney John Clay Washington added to party Jeffrey Garvin(pty:pla) (mme). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ben Travis on behalf of Jeffrey Garvin (Travis, Ben)Attorney Ben Travis added to party Jeffrey Garvin(pty:pla) (jrm). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (rmc)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Payless Car Rental, Inc., Dollar Rent A Car, Inc., Fox Rent A Car, Inc., Advantage Opco, LLC, Does 1-100 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0974-13408176.), filed by Jeffrey Garvin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-172-AJB-WVG. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Zeldes, Helen)(rmc)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
