Sandoval et al v. The Brigantine, Inc. et al
Silvia Alegria, Alexander Sandoval, Misael Rosalez, Johnny Espinoza, Brian Medigovich, Arlyn Angulo, Salvador Valadez, Luke Francis Johnson, Yolanda Flores Landa and Jason Casillas |
The Brigantine, Inc. and DOES 1-25 |
3:2020cv00189 |
January 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Michael S Berg |
Janis L Sammartino |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE Regarding Exhibit Attachment by The Brigantine, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, Errata to Exhibit A and Correction to Paragraph Two (Ahmad, Kevonna) (jpp). |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by The Brigantine, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Fessenden, James) (jpp). |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Brigantine, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Fessenden, James) (jpp). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Diego Superior Court, case number 37-2019-00063186-CU-OE-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13423449.), filed by The Brigantine, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)The new case number is 3:20-cv-189-JLS-MSB. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(smd)(sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.