Steeves v. Internal Revenue Service
| Dean Allen Steeves |
| Internal Revenue Service |
| 3:2020cv00204 |
| January 31, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 0982 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule re #1 MOTION to Quash: The IRS is ordered to respond to Steeves' Motion to Quash no later than 4/27/2020. Steeves may file a reply no later than 5/11/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/30/2020. (jdt)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by John David Kirby on behalf of Dean Allen Steeves (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Kirby, John)Attorney John David Kirby added to party Dean Allen Steeves(pty:pla) (jdt). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER to Retain Counsel. Steeves is ordered to secure counsel immediately. That counsel must be licensed to practice in this Court and must file a notice of appearance no later than 3/27/2020. Steeves is ordered not to submit further briefing or motions until the notice of appearance is filed. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/2/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt)
|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Dean Allen Steeves re #1 Motion to Quash IRS Summons. Nunc Pro Tunc 2/14/2020. (jdt) |
|
Filing 5
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns Accepting Document: Untitled document, from Plaintiff Dean Allen Steeves. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: Improper format; Missing title. Nunc Pro Tunc 2/14/2020. Signed by the Chambers of Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/2/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt)
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dean Allen Steeves. Internal Revenue Service c/o Attorney Michael Hensely served. (jdt) |
| Filing 3 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons amended to replace incorrect judge assignment. (vxc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (vxc) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash by Dean Allen Steeves. (vxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Steeves v. Internal Revenue Service | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Internal Revenue Service | |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dean Allen Steeves | |
| Represented By: | John David Kirby |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
