Cullen v. Western Dental Services, Inc. et al
| John Cullen |
| Western Dental Services, Inc. and Does 1 Through 10 |
| 3:2020cv00248 |
| February 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Marilyn L Huff |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| P.I.: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting #4 Joint Motion for Extension of Time a Response Pleading. Defendant must file any response to Plaintiff's initial complaint on or before 3/31/2020. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 3/10/2020. (sxa)(rmc)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by John Cullen. (Spicker, Karen)(sxa). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Cullen. Western Dental Services, Inc. served. (Spicker, Karen)(sxa). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jxv)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Western Dental Services, Inc., Does 1 Through 10, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13463054.), filed by John Cullen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-00248-H-AGS. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Spicker, Karen)(jxv)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
