Crossley et al v. State of California et al
| Discovery Petition Management LLC., Michael Crossley, PIR Data Processing Inc., Let the Voters Decide, LLC., Valley Direct Marketing LLC., Carolyn Ostic, Chris Brentlinger, Bart Bailey, In the Field, Inc., Carolyn Ostic doing business as Voter Direct and Chris Brentlinger doing business as Bay Area Petitions |
| Xavier Becerra, State of California and John Doe |
| 3:2020cv00284 |
| February 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 ss |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities by State of California. (Grabarsky, Todd) (dlg). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Discovery Petition Management LLC., Bart Bailey, Valley Direct Marketing LLC., Carolyn Ostic, In the Field, Inc., Michael Crossley, Chris Brentlinger, PIR Data Processing Inc., Let the Voters Decide, LLC.. Xavier Becerra served. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service Xavier Becerra)(Baxter, Daniel) (dlg). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Discovery Petition Management LLC., Bart Bailey, Valley Direct Marketing LLC., Carolyn Ostic, In the Field, Inc., Michael Crossley, Chris Brentlinger, PIR Data Processing Inc., Let the Voters Decide, LLC.. State of California served. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service Proof of Service on State of California)(Baxter, Daniel) (dlg). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Withdraw Filing of Summons by Bart Bailey, Chris Brentlinger, Michael Crossley, Discovery Petition Management LLC., In the Field, Inc., Let the Voters Decide, LLC., Carolyn Ostic, PIR Data Processing Inc., Valley Direct Marketing LLC. re #3 Summons Returned Executed, (Baxter, Daniel) (dlg). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance Defendant's Notice of Appearance by Todd Grabarsky on behalf of Xavier Becerra, John Doe, State of California (Grabarsky, Todd)Attorney Todd Grabarsky added to party Xavier Becerra(pty:dft), Attorney Todd Grabarsky added to party John Doe(pty:dft), Attorney Todd Grabarsky added to party State of California(pty:dft) (dlg). |
| Filing 3 *** WITHDRAWN PER ECF 5 *** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Valley Direct Marketing LLC.. All Defendants served. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service Proof of Service on State of California, #2 Summons in Civil Action, #3 Proof of Service Proof of Service on Xavier Becerra)(Baxter, Daniel) qc email, each summons returned executed should be filed separately on the docket (dlg). Modified on 2/28/2020 (dlg). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jxv)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against State of California, Xavier Becerra, John Doe, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0974-13486291.), filed by Michael Crossley, Bart Bailey, Let the Voters Decide, LLC, Valley Direct Marketing LLC, In the Field, Inc., Discovery Petition Management LLC., PIR Data Processing Inc., Carolyn Ostic, Chris Brentlinger, (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-00284-GPC-JLB. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Baxter, Daniel)(jxv)(jxv)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
