Indian Hills Holdings, LLC v. Frye et al
| Indian Hills Holdings, LLC. and Indian Hills Holdings, LLC |
| Does 1-10, Construction & Design Professionals, Corp. and Christopher Frye |
| 3:2020cv00461 |
| March 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Allison H Goddard |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 bc |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Indian Hills Holdings, LLC. Christopher Frye served. (Heilbrun, Dan) (mme).
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Indian Hills Holdings, LLC. Construction & Design Professionals, Corp. served. (Heilbrun, Dan) (mme).
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jxv)(jrd)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Christopher Frye, Construction & Design Professionals, Corp., Does 1-10, (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-13608586.), filed by Indian Hills Holdings, LLC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-B)The new case number is 3:20-cv-461-BEN-AHG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Heilbrun, Dan)(jxv)(jrd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
