Aton Center, Inc. v. Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon et al
| Aton Center, Inc. |
| Does 1 Through 10 and Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon |
| 3:2020cv00497 |
| March 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| William Q Hayes |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 nr |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Aton Center, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice Request for Judicial Notice)(Tower, John) (ag). |
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon. (Lee, Joann) (ag). |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities to Motion to Dismiss, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Exhibit 1 to Reguest for Judicial Notice, #4 Exhibit 2 to Request for Judicial Notice)(Lewis, Carol)Attorney Carol Burney Lewis added to party Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon(pty:dft) (ag). |
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER granting #4 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon shall file an answer or otherwise respond to the #1 Notice of Removal on or before 4/22/2020. (no document attached) (kas) |
Filing 5
ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER RULE. Case reassigned to Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns, Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks no longer assigned to case. Create association to 3:20-cv-00492-WQH-BGS. The new case number is 20cv0497-WQH-BGS. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/25/2020. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/23/2020. (jdt)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, Less than 30 days by Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order Granting Extension of Time)(Lee, Joann)Attorney Joann V. Lee added to party Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon(pty:dft). QC email re: proposed order. No refile (jdt). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon of case(s) 3:20-cv-00492-WQH-BGS; 3:20-cv-00496-BEN-AHG; 3:20-cv-00498-AJB-MDD; 3:20-cv-00500-CAB-MDD; 3:20-cv-00501-JAH-MDD . (Lee, Joann) (jdt). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon re #1 Notice of Removal,, . Identifying Other Affiliate Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon for Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon. (Lee, Joann) (jdt). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2019-00068850-CU-BC-NC. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-13631510.), filed by Regence Blue Cross Blue Shield of Oregon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Exhibit A-4, #6 Exhibit A-5, #7 Exhibit A-6, #8 Declaration for Removal K. Hawthorne, #9 Proof of Service for Removal)The new case number is 3:20-cv-497-LAB-RBB. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case.(Von Behren, William)(jmr) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
