Massaro v. Beyond Meat, Inc. et al
Nazrin Massaro |
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. and Beyond Meat, Inc. |
3:2020cv00510 |
March 18, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Anthony J Battaglia |
Michael S Berg |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. § 0227 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Nazrin Massaro. (Hiraldo, Manuel) |
Filing 26 DECLARATION re #24 MOTION to Stay Pending the FCC's Definition of ATDS by Defendant People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.. (Lee, Sieun) (jrm). |
Filing 25 ORDER BY JUDGE BATTAGLIA, ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule re #23 MOTION to Dismiss or Strike Plaintiff's Nationwide Class Claims, #24 MOTION to Stay Pending the FCC's Definition of ATDS : Responses due by 5/27/2020, Replies due by 6/3/2020, sur-replies will not be accepted.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (sc) |
Filing 24 MOTION to Stay Pending the FCC's Definition of ATDS by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Jeffrey S. Kerr)(Petersen, Shannon) (jrm). |
Filing 23 MOTION to Dismiss or Strike Plaintiff's Nationwide Class Claims by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Jeffrey S. Kerr)(Petersen, Shannon) (jrm). |
Filing 22 ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant Beyond Meat, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to Answer Beyond Meat, Inc. Defendant Beyond Meat, Inc.'s time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's original Complaint is extended by forty-six days, from 4/9/2020 to 5/25/2020. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 4/2/2020. (jrm) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Sieun J. Lee on behalf of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. (Lee, Sieun)Attorney Sieun J. Lee added to party People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.(pty:dft) (jrm). |
Filing 20 Corporate Disclosure Statement by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Petersen, Shannon)(jrm). |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. (Lee, Sieun) (jrm). |
Filing 18 ORDER BY JUDGE BATTAGLIA granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer.; granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as to all Defendants. Answers to Complaint due by 5/13/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (sc) |
Filing 17 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.. (Petersen, Shannon)Attorney Shannon Z. Petersen added to party People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.(pty:dft) (jrm). |
Filing 16 PRO HAC APPROVED: Nicholas L. Schlossman appearing for Defendant Beyond Meat, Inc. (no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 15 PRO HAC APPROVED: Andrew Prins appearing for Defendant Beyond Meat, Inc. (no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 14 PRO HAC APPROVED: Susan E. Engel appearing for Defendant Beyond Meat, Inc. (no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 13 PRO HAC APPROVED: Andrew Brian Clubok appearing for Defendant Beyond Meat, Inc. (no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 12 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-13696512.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Schlossman, Nicholas) (rmc). |
Filing 11 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-13696477.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Prins, Andrew) (rmc). |
Filing 10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-13696454.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Engel, Susan) (rmc). |
Filing 9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-13696429.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Clubok, Andrew) (rmc). |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Beyond Meat, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Justman, Patrick)(jrm). |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Beyond Meat, Inc.. (Justman, Patrick)Attorney Patrick C. Justman added to party Beyond Meat, Inc. (pty:dft) (jrm). |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nazrin Massaro. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. served. (Hiraldo, Manuel) (jrm). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nazrin Massaro. Beyond Meat, Inc. served. (Hiraldo, Manuel)(jrm). |
Filing 4 PRO HAC APPROVED: Manuel Santiago Hiraldo appearing for Plaintiff Nazrin Massaro (no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 3 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-13642261.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Hiraldo, Manuel) (rmc). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmr) (jms). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Beyond Meat, Inc., People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-13640551.), filed by Nazrin Massaro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-510-AJB-MSB. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Nicholas, Craig)(jmr) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.