Kuhne v. Gossamer Bio, Inc. et al
Scott Kuhne |
Faheem Hasnain, SVB Leerink LLC, Barclays Capital Inc., Gossamer Bio, Inc., Renee Gala, Joshua H. Bilenker, Russell Cox, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Thomas Daniel, Bryan Giraudo, Kristina Burow, Otello Stampacchia, Sheila Gujrathi and Evercore Group L.L.C. |
3:2020cv00649 |
April 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Mitchell D Dembin |
Dana M Sabraw |
Securities/Commodities |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Barclays Capital Inc., Joshua H. Bilenker, Kristina Burow, Russell Cox, Thomas Daniel, Evercore Group L.L.C., Renee Gala, Bryan Giraudo, Gossamer Bio, Inc., Sheila Gujrathi, Faheem Hasnain, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, SVB Leerink LLC, Otello Stampacchia ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-13703225.), filed by Scott Kuhne. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification of Securities)The new case number is 3:20-cv-649-DMS-MDD. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Walker, Jacob)(smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.