Torres v. Larios et al
| Gilbert Anthony Torres |
| C/O Morales and C/O Larios |
| 3:2020cv00724 |
| April 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment this case is dismissed without prejudice and with leave amend. If Petitioner wishes to challenge the conditions of his prison life, he must file a civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 which will be given a separate case number.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp)(dlg). |
Filing 2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice and with leave amend. If Petitioner wishes to challenge the conditions of his prison life, he must file a civil complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 which will be given a separate case number. (Blank motion to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to Petitioner). Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/04/2020.(jpp) (dlg).
|
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against Larios, Morales, filed by Gilbert Anthony Torres. ($5.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-724-JLS-BLM. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.(jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
