Weems & Plath, LLC v. Sirius Signal, LLC et al
Weems & Plath, LLC |
Does 1-10, Robert Simons, Jr., Emlinq, LLC, Tektite Industries, Inc., Scott Mele, Anthony Covelli and Sirius Signal, LLC |
3:2020cv00745 |
April 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Gonzalo P Curiel |
Bernard G Skomal |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0292 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (rmc) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *D720,247*, *9,171,436*, *6,168,288* cc:USPTO (rmc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF RELATED CASES in Districts of Maryland and Eastern Pennsylvania by Weems & Plath, LLC. No proposed Low Number Order prepared. (rmc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Sirius Signal, LLC; Anthony Covelli; Emlinq, LLC; Scott Mele; Robert Simons, Jr.; Tektite Industries, Inc.; Does 1-10 (Filing fee $400 receipt number ACASDC-13761728.), filed by Weems & Plath, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-745-GPC-BGS. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Lazenby, Richard)(rmc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.