Santini v. Saul
| George Santini, Jr. |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2020cv00773 |
| April 23, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Ruben B Brooks |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by George Santini, Jr. Andrew Saul served. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Cho, Young) (mme). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Schapel on behalf of Andrew Saul (Schapel, Amanda)Attorney Amanda Schapel added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft) (mme). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Parker on behalf of Andrew Saul (Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine L. Parker added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft) (mme). |
| Filing 8 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by George Santini, Jr. (smd) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme) |
| Filing 6 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks:Pursuant to the Order of the Chief Judge No. 21, which stays all civil cases filed on or after March 1, 2020 against the Commissioner of Social Security under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) due to issues arising out of the COVID-19 public health emergency, this matter is stayed. (mme) |
Filing 5
ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 4/27/2020. (mme)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Ruben B. Brooks has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent / declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (jxv)(jrd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by George Santini, Jr. No Parties With Financial Interest. (jxv)(jrd) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by George Santini, Jr. (jxv)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against Andrew Saul, IFP Filed, filed by George Santini, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-773-RBB. Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks is assigned to the case. (Safa, Cyrus)(jxv)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Santini v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Represented By: | Katherine L. Parker |
| Represented By: | Amanda Schapel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: George Santini, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Cyrus Safa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
