Rivers v. San Diego County et al
| Melvin Warren Rivers and Juice Lee |
| San Diego County, Alessandra Serano and Vincent Bales |
| 3:2020cv00792 |
| April 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Melvin Warren Rivers. (jms) |
Filing 2
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Without Prejudice for Failing to Pay Filing Fee Required and/or Failing to Move In Forma Pauperis. If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $400 civil filing fee or complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will remain dismissed. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 4/30/20.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service, including blank IFP Form)(dlg)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against San Diego County, Alessandra Serano, Vincent Bales, filed by Melvin Warren Rivers. ($400.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-792-GPC-AGS. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
