Arnold v. Corecivic of Tennessee LLC et al
Gregory Arnold |
Does 1 through 25 and Corecivic of Tennessee LLC |
3:2020cv00809 |
April 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Roger T Benitez |
Ruben B Brooks |
Thomas J Whelan |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gregory Arnold. Corecivic of Tennessee LLC served. (Menaldino, Colette) (jdt). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance of Counsel by Colette Noelle Menaldino on behalf of Gregory Arnold (Menaldino, Colette)Attorney Colette Noelle Menaldino added to party Gregory Arnold(pty:pla) (jdt). |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Thomas J. Whelan for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20cv0809-W-RBB.(no document attached) (mme) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmr) (jms). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Corecivic of Tennessee LLC, Does 1 through 25 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-13809573.), filed by Gregory Arnold. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-809-BEN-RBB. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks are assigned to the case. (ACASDC-13809573)(jmr) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.