Amie v. Sherman et al
| Erin R. Amie |
| S. Sherman and Attorney General of the State of California |
| 3:2020cv00897 |
| May 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Linda Lopez |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Transfer Letter Received from CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case number in other court is 2:20-cv-04916 (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mme) |
| Filing 2 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Western Division*.*255 East Temple Street, Room 180**Los Angeles, CA 90012-3332*. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) (dlg). |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against S. Sherman, Attorney General of the State of California, filed by Erin R. Amie. ($5.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-897-JLS-LL. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case.(jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
