Savills Inc. v. Musgjerd et al
| Savills Inc. |
| Robert Mcgriff and Christopher Musgjerd |
| 3:2020cv00904 |
| May 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 33
ORDER Granting #30 Respondent Musgjerd's Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/2/2020. (tcf)
|
|
Filing 32
Minute Order Taking Motion Under Submission: Respondent Christopher Musgjerd's #30 MOTION for Attorneys' Fees is currently set for hearing on September 21, 2020. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, no appearances are required, and the hearing is taken off calendar. SO ORDERED by Judge Michael M. Anello on September 16, 2020. (no document attached) (mxt)
|
|
Filing 31
NON Opposition re #30 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Savills Inc. (Kempinsky, Louis) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 30
MOTION for Attorney Fees by Christopher Musgjerd. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of George Rikos, #3 Exhibit Exhibits to Declaration of George Rikos, #4 Declaration of Bonnie E. McKnight, #5 Proof of Service)(Rikos, George) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 29
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court grants Respondent Musgjerd's motion to dismiss the Petition and declines to rule on Petitioner's motion. (tcf) (jms).
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER (1) Granting Respondent Musgjerd's Motion to Dismiss and (2) Declining to Rule on Petitioner's Motion to Compel Arbitration [Doc. No. #4 , #20 ]. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/29/2020. (tcf) (jms).
|
|
Filing 27
Minute Order Taking Motions Under Submission: Petitioner Savills Inc.'s #4 MOTION to Compel and Respondent Musgjerd's #20 MOTION to Dismiss are currently set for hearing on August 3, 2020. The Court finds these matters suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, no appearances are required, and the hearing is taken off calendar. SO ORDERED by Judge Michael M. Anello on July 29, 2020. (no document attached) (mxt)
|
|
Filing 26
REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Dispute Under 9 U.S.C. 4 and to Enjoin Prosecution of Improperly Filed State Court Action filed by Savills Inc. (Attachments: #1 Response to Musgjerd's to Evidence in Support of Motion to Compel ArbitrationObjections)(Kempinsky, Louis) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 25
REPLY to Response to Motion re #20 MOTION to Dismiss Petition filed by Christopher Musgjerd. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Rikos, George) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 24
DECLARATION re #22 Response in Opposition to Motion, by Respondent Christopher Musgjerd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service)(Rikos, George) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 23
NOTICE of Withdrawal of Documents by Christopher Musgjerd re #22 Response in Opposition to Motion, (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Rikos, George) QC mailer sent re: unable to withdraw portions of filing, the entire document must be withdrawn (tcf).
|
|
Filing 22
RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Dispute Under 9 U.S.C. 4 and to Enjoin Prosecution of Improperly Filed State Court Action filed by Christopher Musgjerd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of George Rikos, #2 Declaration of Christopher Musgjerd, #3 Declaration of John Musgjerd, #4 Notice Objections to Declaration of Morgan, #5 Notice Objections to Declaration of Woods, #6 Proof of Service)(Rikos, George) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 21
RESPONSE in Opposition re #20 MOTION to Dismiss Petition filed by Savills Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Kempinsky, Louis) (tcf).
|
| Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss Petition by Christopher Musgjerd. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration, #3 Proof of Service)(Rikos, George) (tcf). |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Veronica McKnight on behalf of Christopher Musgjerd (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(McKnight, Veronica)Attorney Veronica McKnight added to party Christopher Musgjerd(pty:res) (jmo). |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron David Sadock on behalf of Christopher Musgjerd (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Sadock, Aaron)Attorney Aaron David Sadock added to party Christopher Musgjerd(pty:res) (jmo). |
|
Filing 17
ORDER Granting #16 Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to Respond to Petition. The Court GRANTS the parties' joint motion and ORDERS that Musgjerd respond to the Petition on or before 7/6/2020. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 6/23/2020. (tcf)
|
| Filing 16 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Christopher Musgjerd. (Rikos, George) (tcf). |
|
Filing 15
ORDER Denying #11 Respondent Musgjerd's Ex Parte Motion to Continue Pending Motion to Compel Arbitration until after Court Rules on Anticipated Motion to Dismiss. The Court DENIES Respondent Musgjerd's ex parte motion to continue Petitioner's pending motion to compel until after the Court rules on Musgjerd's anticipated motion to dismiss. The Court SETS a coordinated briefing schedule for both Petitioner's pending motion to compel arbitration and Musgjerd's anticipated motion to dismiss. Based on Musgjerd's representation that his responsive pleading is due June 26 and that the parties appear to be in the process of filing a joint motion to extend Musgjerd's response deadline to the Petition, see Doc. No. #11 at 2, the Court (1) RESETS Petitioner's pending motion to compel arbitration to be heard on August 3, 2020 at 2:30 P.M. in Courtroom 3D and (2) SETS Respondent Musgjerd's anticipated motion to dismiss, if any, to be heard concurrently on August 3, 2020 at 2:30 P.M. in Courtroom 3D. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 6/19/2020. (tcf)
|
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response to Motion re #11 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Dispute Under 9 U.S.C. 4 and to Enjoin Prosecution of Improperly Filed State Court Action, #1 MOTION to Compel, #1 Motion to C filed by Christopher Musgjerd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Rikos, George) (tcf). |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #11 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Dispute Under 9 U.S.C. 4 and to Enjoin Prosecution of Improperly Filed State Court Action, #1 MOTION to Compel, #1 Motion to C filed by Savills Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Louis A. Kempinsky)(Kempinsky, Louis) (tcf). |
|
Filing 12
Minute Order Re: #11 Ex Parte Motion: On June 16, 2020, Respondent Musgjerd filed an #11 EX PARTE MOTION to Continue Pending Motion to Compel Arbitration Until After Court Rules on Anticipated Motion to Dismiss. Pursuant to Judge Anello's Civil Chambers Rules, Petitioner requested additional time to respond to the ex parte motion. Accordingly, good cause appearing, Petitioner must file its opposition to Respondent Musgjerd's ex parte motion on or before June 18, 2020. If Petitioner does not file an opposition by the stated deadline, the Court may deem Respondent Musgjerd's motion as unopposed. SO ORDERED by Judge Michael M. Anello on June 16, 2020.(no document attached) (mxt)
|
| Filing 11 Ex Parte MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Dispute Under 9 U.S.C. 4 and to Enjoin Prosecution of Improperly Filed State Court Action, #1 MOTION to Compel, #1 Motion to Compel Arbitration Award, by Christopher Musgjerd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of George Rikos)(Rikos, George) (tcf). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by George Rikos on behalf of Christopher Musgjerd (Rikos, George)Attorney George Rikos added to party Christopher Musgjerd(pty:res) (tcf). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sieun J. Lee on behalf of Robert Mcgriff (Lee, Sieun)Attorney Sieun J. Lee added to party Robert Mcgriff(pty:res) (tcf). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon Z. Petersen on behalf of Robert Mcgriff (Petersen, Shannon)Attorney Shannon Z. Petersen added to party Robert Mcgriff(pty:res) (tcf). |
| Filing 7 NON Opposition re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Dispute Under 9 U.S.C. 4 and to Enjoin Prosecution of Improperly Filed State Court Action filed by Robert Mcgriff. (Petersen, Shannon) (tcf). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Robert Mcgriff (Lee, Sieun) (tcf). |
| Filing 5 NON Opposition re #1 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Dispute filed by Robert Mcgriff. (Petersen, Shannon) (tcf). |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration of Dispute Under 9 U.S.C. 4 and to Enjoin Prosecution of Improperly Filed State Court Action by Savills Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Matthew Morgan, #3 Exhibit Exhibits to Declaration of Matthew Morgan, #4 Declaration of Janet Woods, #5 Request for Judicial Notice, #6 Exhibit to Request for Judicial Notice)(Kempinsky, Louis) (sxa). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (vxc) (dsn) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Savills Inc. Identifying Corporate Parent Savills plc. for Savills Inc. (vxc) (dsn) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Compel by Savills Inc.. (vxc) Modified on 5/14/2020 (vxc)(dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
