Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University
| Aparna Vashisht-Rota |
| Ottawa University |
| 3:2020cv00959 |
| May 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| William Q Hayes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 df |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF RELATED CASE(S) by Ottawa University of case(s) 20-cv-0321-JLS-KSC . (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Meek, Michelle)
|
|
Filing 14
Motion to Put Case under Seal by Aparna Vashisht-Rota. NUNC PRO TUNC 7/20/2020. (ag)
|
|
Filing 13
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge William Q. Hayes Accepting Document: Motion to Put Case under Seal, from Plaintiff Aparna Vashisht-Rota. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ.L. Rule 5.1 - Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation. Nunc Pro Tunc 7/20/2020. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/23/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing 11
Supplemental Brief with Additional Examples of Perjury and Plaintiff Assertion of Whistleblower Protections Pursuant to California Labor Code by Aparna Vashisht-Rota. NUNC PRO TUNC 7/15/2020. (ag)
|
|
Filing 10
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge William Q. Hayes Accepting Document: Supplemental Brief with Additional Examples of Perjury and Plaintiff Assertion of Whistleblower Protections Pursuant to California Labor Code, from Plaintiff Aparna Vashisht-Rota. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Supplemental documents require court order. Nunc Pro Tunc 7/15/2020. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/17/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing 12
Supplemental Brief with Plaintiff's Amended Complaint to Assert Whistleblower Protections Pursuant to California Labor Code 1102.5 by Aparna Vashisht-Rota (ag)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ENTRY: The parties' Joint Motion to Extend Time for Defendant to File a Responsive Pleading (ECF. #8 ) is granted. Defendant's deadline to file a responsive pleading is extended to July 31, 2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (ag)
|
|
Filing 8
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Ottawa University. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Meek, Michelle)Attorney Michelle Kristin Meek added to party Ottawa University(pty:dft) (ag).
|
|
Filing 7
Supplement to Paragraph 5 of the Introduction in the Amended Complaint Aparna Vashisht-Rota. NUNC PRO TUNC 6/19/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge William Q. Hayes Accepting Document: Supplement to Paragraph 5 of the Introduction in the Amended Complaint, from Plaintiff Aparna Vashisht-Rota. Non-compliance with local rule(s), FRCvP 15(d) - Supplemental documents require court order. Nunc Pro Tunc 6/19/2020. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/23/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Electronically File Documents (ECF No. #2 ) is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended motion that complies with the ECF Manuel's Provisions. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/11/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff shall respond to this Order within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/11/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ag)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (vxc) (dsn)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Electronically File Documents by Aparna Vashisht-Rota. (vxc) (dsn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Ottawa University ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CAS121598.), filed by Aparna Vashisht-Rota. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C part 1, #5 Exhibit C part 2, #6 Exhibit D part 1, #7 Exhibit D part 2, #8 Exhibit D part 3, #9 Exhibit D part 4, #10 Exhibit E, #11 Receipt)The new case number is 3:20-cv-959-WQH-MSB. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Vashisht-Rota, Aparna)(vxc) (dsn)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Vashisht-Rota v. Ottawa University | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Aparna Vashisht-Rota | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ottawa University | |
| Represented By: | Michelle Kristin Meek |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
