Vangieson v. Esper et al
| Richard Vangieson |
| DOES 1 through 10, the Defense Contract Audit Agency and Mark Esper |
| 3:2020cv01033 |
| June 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Linda Lopez |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0791 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Vangieson. Mark Esper, the Defense Contract Audit Agency served. (Vanderpool, Jonathan) (jdt). |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20cv1033-LAB-LL.(no document attached) (mme) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against DOES 1 through 10, Mark Esper, the Defense Contract Audit Agency ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-13971183.), filed by Richard Vangieson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1033-BEN-LL. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case. (Vanderpool, Jonathan)(smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
