Abdel-Malak v. Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego et al
| Abanoob Abdel-Malak |
| Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego, David Gary Pierce, San Diego Police Department, County of San Diego, Diana Bryant, John Doe #1, Faheem Sediqi, Katrina Hinzo, David Matthew Johansen, Robert Tipre, Unknown San Diego Dispatcher, Attorney Robert Deller and Law Offices of Robert Deller and Associates, Inc., San Diego County District Attorney's Office, Attorney Mario Rivas and Law Office of Mario Rivas, Office of the City Attorney City of San Diego and San Diego County Sheriff's Department |
| 3:2020cv01035 |
| June 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Direct Appeal to Supreme Court by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (akr) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Direct Appeal to Supreme Court by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (akr) |
Filing 12
ORDER Denying Ex Parte Application [Doc. No. #11 . Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 6/29/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
| Filing 11 Ex parte Request for Indicative Ruling under Rule 62.1(A); to Disqualify Judges; appointment of counsel; and Leave to Amend by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. Nunc Pro Tunc 6/19/2020. (anh) (Main Document 11 replaced on 7/23/2020) (anh). On 7/23/2020 Plaintiff notified clerks office of scanning error. The image has been rescanned and replaced. (anh). NEF Mailed to plaintiff (anh). |
|
Filing 10
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo Accepting Document: Request for Indicative Ruling, from Plaintiff Abanoob Abdel-Malak. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Case closed. Notice of appeal filed.. Nunc Pro Tunc Case closed. Notice of appeal filed.. Signed by the chambers of Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 6/26/2020.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER of USCA as to #6 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. A review of the USDC's docket reflects that the USDC has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellant's in forma pauperis status. The USCA may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in the USCA a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the USDC $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in the USCA proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. (akr)
|
| Filing 8 USCA Time Schedule Order as to #6 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (akr) |
| Filing 7 USCA Case Number 20-55619 for #6 Notice of Appeal to the 9th Circuit filed by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (akr) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit by Abanoob Abdel-Malak as to #5 Clerk's Judgment. Fee not paid. (In #4 Order, the US District Court certified "that an IFP appeal from this order would be frivolous and therefore would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3)." Notice of Appeal electronically transmitted to the US Court of Appeals.) (akr) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that For the foregoing reasons, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion to proceed IFP [Doc. No. 2] is GRANTED; 2. The complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend; 3. The application for permission for electronic filing [Doc. No. 3] is DENIED AS MOOT; 4. The Court certifies that an IFP appeal from this order would be frivolous and therefore would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3);. Case Closed. It is SO ORDERED.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting Application for Leave to Proceed for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Sua Sponte Dismssing Complaint [Doc. No. #2 , #3 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 6/8/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
| Filing 3 Application for Permission for Electronic Filing by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (jmr) (jms). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (jmr) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Attorney Mario Rivas and Law Office of Mario Rivas, Attorney Robert Deller and Law Offices of Robert Deller and Associates, Inc., Diana Bryant, County of San Diego, John Doe #1, Katrina Hinzo, David Matthew Johansen, Office of the City Attorney City of San Diego, David Gary Pierce, San Diego County District Attorney's Office, San Diego County Sheriff's Department, San Diego Police Department, Faheem Sediqi, Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego, Robert Tipre, Unknown San Diego Dispatcher, IFP Filed, filed by Abanoob Abdel-Malak. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1035-CAB-JLB. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.(jmr) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
