Sekerke v. Olsen et al
Keith Wayne Sekerke |
Mike Lawson, Dane Olsen and Adam Arkwright |
3:2020cv01045 |
June 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Ruben B Brooks |
Gonzalo P Curiel |
William Q Hayes |
Bernard G Skomal |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER PURSUANT TO LOW NUMBER RULE. Case reassigned to Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks for all further proceedings. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal no longer assigned to case. Pending hearings previously set before the original Judge(s) have been transferred to the newly assigned Judge(s). Create association to 3:19-cv-00034-GPC-RBB. The new case number is 20cv1045-GPC-RBB. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 7/2/2020. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 6/30/2020. Motions set before Ruben B. Brooks.(ag) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keith Wayne Sekerke. (jms) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Dane Olsen, Adam Arkwright, Mike Lawson, filed by Keith Wayne Sekerke. ($400.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1045-WQH-BGS. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.