Vanis v. Nielsen
Plaintiff: Tracy Vanis
Defendant: Kirstjen Nielsen
Case Number: 3:2020cv01047
Filed: June 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Houston
Referring Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tracy Vanis. (sxa)
June 8, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kirstjen Nielsen (Filing fee $ 400 due.), filed by Tracy Vanis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1047-JAH-BLM. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Vanis, Tracy)(smd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vanis v. Nielsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Vanis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kirstjen Nielsen
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?