De La Tova v. Saul
| Angelica Yannette De La Tova |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2020cv01055 |
| June 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Nita L Stormes |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Michael M. Anello Rejecting Document: Consent/Declination Form, from Plaintiff Angelica Yannette De La Tova. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 7.1: Documents are not timely. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/10/2020. (tcf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/10/2020: #1 Rejected Document) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER Referring Matter to United States Magistrate Judge for Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 7/2/2020. (tcf)
|
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes is no longer assigned as presiding judge. Case reassigned to Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20CV1055-MMA-NLS.(no document attached) (sjt) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter)[IFP Packet mailed to plaintiff's attorney](mme) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. US Marshal shall effect service of complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 6/15/2020. (mme)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Nita L. Stormes has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (sjt) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Angelica Yannette De La Tova. (sjt) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Angelica Yannette De La Tova. No Parties With Financial Interest. (sjt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, IFP Filed. Filed by Angelica Yannette De La Tova. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1055-NLS. Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes is assigned to the case. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)(sjt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: De La Tova v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angelica Yannette De La Tova | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence D Rohlfing |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
