Martinez v. Saul
| Sancarlos Martinez |
| Andrew Saul |
| 3:2020cv01061 |
| June 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Parker on behalf of Andrew Saul (Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine L. Parker added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft) (mme). |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Lahey on behalf of Andrew Saul (Lahey, Sharon)Attorney Sharon Lahey added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft) (mme). |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sancarlos Martinez. Andrew Saul served. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Gerrard, Josephine) (mme). |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mme) |
| Filing 6 Fee for Civil Case Opening: $ 400, receipt number ACASDC-14046855, Paid on 6/22/2020. (no document attached) (Gerrard, Josephine) (mme). |
Filing 5
ORDER Denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If Plaintiff seeks to resubmit his request, he is directed to complete form AO 239 (Rev. 01/15), Application to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 6/19/2020. (mme)
|
| Filing 4 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by Sancarlos Martinez. (jmr) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Sancarlos Martinez. (Gerrard, Josephine) Modified to correct event on 6/10/2020 (sjt). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Mitchell D. Dembin has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (smd) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul (Filing fee $400 due), filed by Sancarlos Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1061-MDD. Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin is assigned to the case. (Gerrard, Josephine)(smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Represented By: | Katherine L. Parker |
| Represented By: | Sharon Lahey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sancarlos Martinez | |
| Represented By: | Josephine Mary Gerrard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
