Lopez-Castro v. Barr et al
| Edith Lopez-Castro |
| David Harlow, Steven C. Stafford, William Pelham Barr and John Kelly |
| 3:2020cv01101 |
| June 17, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Edith Lopez-Castro (Dudani, Salil) (jdt). |
| Filing 4 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler: Writ Hearing held on 6/17/2020. Writ is denied without prejudice. (CD# 6/17/2020 AGS 20-1:4:33-4:50). (Plaintiff Attorney Patrick Swan AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Benjamin Davis FD-S/A, Salil Dudani FD-S/A). (no document attached) (aje) |
| Filing 3 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by Edith Lopez-Castro (Dudani, Salil) (jdt). |
| Filing 2 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Edith Lopez-Castro. (Attachments: #1 Writ of Habeas Corpus)(jmr) (jms). |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against William Pelham Barr, David Harlow, John Kelly, Steven C. Stafford, No Fee Required, filed by Edith Lopez-Castro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Writ of Habeas Corpus)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1101-LAB. Judge Larry Alan Burns is assigned to the case. (Dudani, Salil)(jmr) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
