Waterbury v. LeadPoint, Inc. et al
| Steven Waterbury |
| Does 1 Through 10 and LeadPoint, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv01279 |
| July 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Dana M Sabraw |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Granting Joint Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint #4 . LeadPoint, Inc. answer due 9/16/2020. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/14/20. (jmo)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by LeadPoint, Inc.. (Morales, Esteban)Attorney Esteban Morales added to party LeadPoint, Inc.(pty:dft) (mme). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Waterbury. LeadPoint, Inc. served. (Rubel, Kira) (mme). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmr) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1 Through 10, LeadPoint, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14127106.), filed by Steven Waterbury. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1279-DMS-MDD. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Rubel, Kira)(jmr) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
