Bonilla v. The Alameda County District Attorney's Office Civil Conspiracy et al
Steven Wayne Bonilla |
John Doe 1-40,000 and The Alameda County District Attorney's Office Civil Conspiracy |
3:2020cv01297 |
July 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Larry Alan Burns |
Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: The Court dismisses this civil action. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt) (sjt). |
Filing 2 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION for Failure to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). The Court certifies that an IFP appeal from this Order would be frivolous and not taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3). The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to enter a judgment of dismissal and to close the file. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/20/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt) (sjt). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Against The Alameda County District Attorney's Office Civil Conspiracy, John Doe 1-40,000, filed by Steven Wayne Bonilla. ($400.00 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1297-LAB-RBM. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro are assigned to the case.(jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.