Thongstisubskul v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. et al
| Adrian Thongstisubskul |
| Capital One, N.A. and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. |
| 3:2020cv01306 |
| July 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Adrian Thongstisubskul, as to Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Capital One, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hart, Yana) (jpp). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel G. Shay on behalf of Adrian Thongstisubskul (Shay, Daniel)Attorney Daniel G. Shay added to party Adrian Thongstisubskul(pty:pla) (jpp). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sjt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Capital One, N.A. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14139988). Filed by Adrian Thongstisubskul. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1306-JLS-BGS. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Hart, Yana)(sjt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
