La Roca Christian Communities International, Inc. v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.
La Roca Christian Communities International, Inc. |
Church Mutual Insurance Co. |
3:2020cv01324 |
July 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Dana M Sabraw |
Bernard G Skomal |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss All Causes of Action Asserted in Plaintiff's Complaint by Church Mutual Insurance Co.. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Holmes, James) (mme). |
Filing 7 ORDER Following Status Conference. Telephonic status conference held 8/17/20. Defendant shall file its motion to dismiss on or before 8/21/20. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/17/20.(jmo) |
Filing 9 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dana M. Sabraw: Telephonic Status Conference held on 8/17/2020. (Plaintiff Attorney Alexandra Selfridge). (Defendant Attorney Jim Holmes, Lisa Henderson). (no document attached) (jak) |
Filing 6 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Lisa Henderson, re #5 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 8/7/2020.(rmc) |
Filing 5 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-14266774.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Henderson, Lisa) (rmc). |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by La Roca Christian Communities International, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Selfridge, Alexandra) (mme). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by La Roca Christian Communities International, Inc.. Church Mutual Insurance Co. served. (Selfridge, Alexandra) (mme). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmr) (sjt). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Church Mutual Insurance Co. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14156743.), filed by La Roca Christian Communities International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Index and Exhibits ISO)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1324-DMS-BGS. Judge Dana M. Sabraw and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Selfridge, Alexandra)(jmr) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: La Roca Christian Communities International, Inc. v. Church Mutual Insurance Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: La Roca Christian Communities International, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Alexandra Selfridge |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Church Mutual Insurance Co. | |
Represented By: | Lisa M. Henderson |
Represented By: | James J.S. Holmes |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.