Brooks v. Bank of America, NA
William Norman Brooks, III |
Bank of America, NA |
3:2020cv01348 |
July 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cynthia Bashant |
Linda Lopez |
Consumer Credit |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER Granting Joint Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Complaint #10 . Defendant's response to complaint due 9/16/2020. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/18/20. (jmo) |
Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (Joint Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to Complaint) by Bank of America, NA. (Oakley, Danielle)Attorney Danielle N. Oakley added to party Bank of America, NA(pty:dft) (dlg). |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Norman Brooks, III. Bank of America, NA served. (Hussin, Tammy) (jmo). |
Filing 8 PRO HAC APPROVED: James A. Francis appearing for Plaintiff William Norman Brooks, III (no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 7 PRO HAC APPROVED: Lauren Kw Brennan appearing for Plaintiff William Norman Brooks, III (no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 6 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice, No payment Submitted. (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Brennan, Lauren) (rmc). |
Filing 5 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice, No payment Submitted. (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Francis, James) (rmc). |
Filing 4 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-14228888.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Francis, James) QC mail sent re missing signature on 7/28/2020, instructed to re-file without re-paying (rmc). |
Filing 3 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-14209122.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Brennan, Lauren) QC mail sent re missing signature on 7/23/2020; instructed to re-file without re-paying (rmc). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) (sjt). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bank of America, NA ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14170064.), filed by William Norman Brooks, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1348-BAS-LL. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge Linda Lopez are assigned to the case. (Hussin, Tammy)(smd)(sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brooks v. Bank of America, NA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bank of America, NA | |
Represented By: | Danielle N. Oakley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: William Norman Brooks, III | |
Represented By: | Tammy Gruder Hussin |
Represented By: | James A. Francis |
Represented By: | Lauren Kw Brennan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.