Lopez v. Smiths Detection, Inc. et al
| Alberto Lopez |
| Smiths Detection, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50 |
| 3:2020cv01453 |
| July 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| William V Gallo |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by Alberto Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Walker, Lorrie) (jpp).
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES by Smiths Detection, Inc.. (Cole, Carmen) (jpp).
|
|
Filing 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Smiths Detection, Inc. (Cole, Carmen) Mod(jpp).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Smiths Detection, Inc. Identifying Corporate Parent Smiths Group PLC for Smiths Detection, Inc.. (jmr)(jms).
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, case number 37-2020-00021812- CU-WT-CTL. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14233536.), filed by Smiths Detection, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1453-JLS-WVG. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.(jmr) (jms).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
