Inhale, Inc. v. Enhale Smoke Shop, Inc et al
| Inhale, Inc. |
| Enhale Smoke Shop, Inc a California corporation doing business as Inhale Smoke Shop and Nael Yohana |
| 3:2020cv01658 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPORT of Patent and Trademark Closing, regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) 2,591,605, 3,891,300, re #4 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. cc:USPTO (rmc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Inhale, Inc. (Teran, Louis) (dlg). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (zda)(jrd) |
| Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *2,591,605*, *3,891,300* (cc: USPTO)(zda)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT With Jury Demand Against Enhale Smoke Shop, Inc., Nael Yohana, (Filing fee $400.00 receipt number ACASDC-14392367.), filed by Inhale, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1658-GPC-MDD. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Teran, Louis)(zda)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
