Rosas v. Barr et al
| Steven C. Stafford, John Kelly, David Harlow and William Pelham Barr |
| James Brandon Rosas |
| 3:2020cv01667 |
| August 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal: Writ Hearing held on 8/26/2020. The Court grants the Writ of Habeas Corpus and orders the defendant to appear in court on 8/27/2020 at 2:00pm before Duty Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal. (CD# 8/26/2020 BGS 20-1:3:29-3:32). (Plaintiff Attorney James Miao AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Jessica Oliva FD-S/A). (no document attached) (aje) |
| Filing 3 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Court by James Brandon Rosas (Oliva, Jessica) |
| Filing 2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by James Brandon Rosas. (Attachments: #1 Writ of Habeas Corpus)(jmr) (jms). |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against William Pelham Barr, David Harlow, John Kelly, Steven C. Stafford, No Fee Required, filed by James Brandon Rosas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Writ of Habeas Corpus)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1667-LAB. Judge Larry Alan Burns is assigned to the case. (Oliva, Jessica)(jmr) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
