Karamelion LLC v. Systech Corporation
Karamelion LLC |
Systech Corporation |
3:2020cv01692 |
August 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Roger T Benitez |
Gonzalo P Curiel |
William V Gallo |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPORT of Patent and Trademark Closing, regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) 6,275,166, re #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. cc:USPTO (rmc) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Karamelion LLC WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Ritcheson, Steven) (mme). |
Filing 9 ORDER Denying the Pro Hac Vice Application of David R. Bennett (Re: ECF No. #8 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice). Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 11/4/2020.(jrd) |
Filing 8 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice, No payment Submitted. (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Bennett, David) (rmc). |
Filing 7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 206 receipt number ACASDC-14761447.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Bennett, David) QC mail sent re missing signature on 10/27/2020, instructed to re-file without re-paying (rmc). |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting #5 Joint Motion for Request to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. Defendant Systech Corporation shall respond to the Complaint on or before January 5, 2021. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 10/27/2020. (mme) |
Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Systech Corporation. (Sloss, Robert)Attorney Robert H. Sloss added to party Systech Corporation(pty:dft) (mme). |
Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel has declined assignment pursuant to General Order 598. Case reassigned to Judge Roger T. Benitez for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20cv1692 BEN (WVG).(no document attached) (jcj) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *6,275,166* cc:USPTO (vxc) (dsn) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (vxc) (dsn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Systech Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14419021.), filed by Karamelion LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1692-GPC-WVG. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case. (Ritcheson, Steven)(vxc) (dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Karamelion LLC v. Systech Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Systech Corporation | |
Represented By: | Robert H. Sloss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Karamelion LLC | |
Represented By: | Steven Whitefield Ritcheson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.