Farish v. DHS et al
| Abdul Muizz Farish |
| Matthew Albence, DHS, Chad Wolf, ICE and William P. Barr |
| 3:2020cv01716 |
| September 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Abdul Muizz Farish (jms) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address filed on Behalf of Abdul Muizz Farish (jms) |
Filing 3
ORDER Denying #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; and ORDER Dismissing Petition Without Prejudice. No later than 10/30/2020, Farish may file an amended petition correcting the defects this order has pointed out. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 10/8/2020. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (jdt)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Abdul Muizz Farish. (jms)(jrd) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Against DHS, ICE, Chad Wolf, William P. Barr, Matthew Albence, filed by Abdul Muizz Farish. (Filing fee $5.00, Fee Paid, receipt number CAS123886, IFP Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1716-LAB-MSB. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(jms)(jrd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
