Floyd v. City of San Diego et al
Plaintiff: Derek Floyd
Defendant: DOES 1-10 and City of San Diego
Case Number: 3:2020cv01737
Filed: September 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Bashant
Referring Judge: Roger T Benitez
2 Judge: Allison H Goddard
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE AND ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference Via Videoconference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 12/14/2020 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. Case Management Conference set for 12/14/2020 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. The parties must file a Joint Case Management Statement by 12/7/20. Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 10/28/20.(jmo) Modified on 10/28/2020 to correct text and regenerate NEF (jmo).
October 27, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by City of San Diego. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Abad, Dave) (jmo).
October 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Deadlines (ECF No. #4 ). The City of San Diego shall respond to the Complaint on or before 10/27/20. Derek Floyd shall file a reply on or before 11/3/20. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 10/14/20. (jmo)
October 13, 2020 Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by City of San Diego. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Abad, Dave)Attorney Dave Esteves Abad added to party City of San Diego(pty:dft) (jmo).
September 8, 2020 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cynthia Bashant for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20cv1737-BAS-AHG.(no document attached) (mme)
September 4, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) (sjt).
September 4, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against City of San Diego ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14453670.), filed by Derek Floyd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1737-BEN-AHG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Robertson, Thomas)(smd) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Floyd v. City of San Diego et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of San Diego
Represented By: Dave Esteves Abad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derek Floyd
Represented By: Thomas Eugene Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?