McCormick v. County of San Diego et al
| Dianne McCormick |
| San Diego Sheriffs Deputies Does 1-10, County of San Diego, David Krawczyk and Tyler Norby |
| 3:2020cv01753 |
| September 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jeffrey T Miller |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER on #11 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 10/29/2020. (sjt)
|
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Amended Complaint by County of San Diego, David Krawczyk, Tyler Norby. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Lenert, Ronald) (sjt). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT by Tyler Norby, County of San Diego, David Krawczyk re #9 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Amended Complaint filed by David Krawczyk, County of San Diego, Tyler Norby . (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Lenert, Ronald) (sjt). |
| Filing 9 **DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN PER NOTICE #10 ** Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #5 Amended Complaint by County of San Diego, David Krawczyk, Tyler Norby. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Lenert, Ronald)Attorney Ronald Lenert added to party David Krawczyk(pty:dft), Attorney Ronald Lenert added to party Tyler Norby(pty:dft) (sjt). Modified to withdraw 10/30/2020 (sjt). |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Dianne McCormick, as to David Krawczyk, Tyler Norby. (Rutman, Keith) (sjt). |
|
Filing 7
Minute Order. by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller: The Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss and Partial Motion to Strike (Doc. No. #4 .) are DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice. The November 2, 2020 hearing on the motions is therefore VACATED. (no document attached) (gac) Modified on 10/26/2020 edit date(gac).
|
| Filing 6 Summons on an Amended Complaint Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sjt) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Dianne McCormick.New Summons Requested. (Rutman, Keith) (sjt). |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint, by County of San Diego. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant County of San Diego's Partial Motion To Dismiss and Partial Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Proof of Service)(Lenert, Ronald)Attorney Ronald Lenert added to party County of San Diego(pty:dft) (sjt). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dianne McCormick. County of San Diego served. (Rutman, Keith) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (vxc) (dsn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against County of San Diego, San Diego Sheriffs Deputies Does 1-10 ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14466606.), filed by Dianne McCormick. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1753-JM-AGS. Judge Jeffrey T. Miller and Magistrate Judge Andrew G. Schopler are assigned to the case. (Rutman, Keith)(vxc) (dsn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
