Cota v. Ethan Allen Retail, Inc. et al
| Julissa Cota |
| DOES 1 to 10 and Ethan Allen Retail, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv01811 |
| September 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anthony J Battaglia |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Julissa Cota. Ethan Allen Retail, Inc. served. (Coelho, Thiago) (jrm). |
| Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Anthony J. Battaglia for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20cv1811-AJB-KSC.(no document attached) (mme) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (sjt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against DOES 1 to 10, Ethan Allen Retail, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14502578). Filed by Julissa Cota. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1811-BEN-KSC. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Coelho, Thiago)(sjt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
