Theroux v. Susie Thai Alteration et al
| Vern Robert Theroux, Jr. |
| Susie Thai Alteration and DOES 1 through 10 |
| 3:2020cv01852 |
| September 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Thomas J. Whelan for all further proceedings. The new case number is 20cv1852-W-BGS.(no document attached) (mme) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (smd) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Vern Robert Theroux, Jr. No Parties With Financial Interest. (smd) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1 through 10, Susie Thai Alteration ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACASDC-14534361.), filed by Vern Robert Theroux, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-1852-BEN-BGS. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Smith, Richard)(smd) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
